Star Trek.

May. 9th, 2009 09:54 pm
matt_doyle: (Default)
[personal profile] matt_doyle


Bad things:

The camera work was queasy-making.

The science was a little more awful than usual (but I didn't care).

Good things:

EVERYTHING ELSE.

The cast was pitch-perfect, most especially Karl Urban and Zachary Quinto. The rest did a little more branching out in new directions and delving into their characters more deeply than the original series, which was good. I can definitely handle a competent Chekov. While the exposition was a little too much, the concept worked for me, and the execution was stylish and dramatic.

Although I still think that the scriptwriters started out by adapting the novel Best Destiny into a movie, and the rest came about as the result of making it AU.

So. When are they starting filming on the next one?



Discuss.

Date: 2009-05-10 12:52 pm (UTC)
feuervogel: photo of the statue of Victory and her chariot on the Brandenburg Gate (Default)
From: [personal profile] feuervogel
I was very pleased that I didn't keep thinking SYLAR!!!! during the movie. Unlike Agent Smith of Rivendell, Quinto totally owned the role of Spock. No Spocklar at all.

Profile

matt_doyle: (Default)
matt_doyle

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 23rd, 2026 11:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios